Triple

T18566865
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject IAS 40 E453778 entity
Predicate costModelTreatment P132560 FINISHED
Object depreciation recognised in accordance with IAS 16 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: depreciation recognised in accordance with IAS 16 | Statement: [IAS 40, costModelTreatment, depreciation recognised in accordance with IAS 16]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: costModelTreatment
Context triple: [IAS 40, costModelTreatment, depreciation recognised in accordance with IAS 16]
  • A. costModel
    Indicates the pricing or cost-structure relationship applied to an entity, defining how its costs are calculated or charged.
  • B. costToUser
    Indicates the amount of cost or expense that is borne by, charged to, or incurred by the user.
  • C. costSharing
    Indicates how the financial burden of a cost is divided or shared among multiple parties.
  • D. costsProvision
    Indicates that providing a particular good, service, or resource requires incurring a specified cost.
  • E. chargesBasedOn
    Indicates that one party determines or applies a fee, price, or cost to another party or item according to a specified basis, criterion, or reference.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38974308190a9174430ef256b73 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e53aff027481909ca7257967967650 completed April 19, 2026, 8:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e478c16e0c8190b03966aa23c395a6 completed April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e484121cd48190bf583b4c94636a30 completed April 19, 2026, 7:28 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:43 a.m.