Triple
T18566667
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements |
E453774
|
entity |
| Predicate | prohibitsForJointVentures |
P272
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Proportionate consolidation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Proportionate consolidation | Statement: [IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements, prohibitsForJointVentures, Proportionate consolidation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: prohibitsForJointVentures Context triple: [IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements, prohibitsForJointVentures, Proportionate consolidation]
-
A.
hasJointVenture
Indicates that two or more entities are engaged together in a formally established joint business venture or collaborative commercial undertaking.
-
B.
prohibits
chosen
Indicates that one entity forbids or disallows another entity from performing a specific action or being in a certain state.
-
C.
isProhibitedFor
Indicates that a certain action, object, or condition is not allowed or is forbidden for a specified entity or group.
-
D.
hasJointVenturePartner
Indicates that an entity is engaged in a joint venture relationship with another entity as a formal business partner.
-
E.
formerJointVentureWith
Indicates that two entities were previously engaged together in a joint venture relationship that has since ended.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38974308190a9174430ef256b73 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e53aff027481909ca7257967967650 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e478c16e0c8190b03966aa23c395a6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:43 a.m.