Triple
T18564527
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UTF-16 |
E453728
|
entity |
| Predicate | endiannessDependent |
P132530
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [UTF-16, endiannessDependent, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: endiannessDependent Context triple: [UTF-16, endiannessDependent, true]
-
A.
endianness
Indicates the ordering of bytes used to represent multi-byte data values in memory or storage.
-
B.
endianess
Indicates the byte order relationship specifying how multi-byte data is arranged in memory or during transmission (e.g., little-endian vs big-endian).
-
C.
isEndiannessAgnostic
Indicates that the behavior or data format is independent of byte order, producing correct results regardless of the system’s endianness.
-
D.
bitOrder
Indicates the ordering or sequence of bits within a binary representation, such as which bit positions are considered first or most significant.
-
E.
encodingIndependence
Indicates that a relationship or property holds regardless of the specific encoding or representation used for the involved entities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38974308190a9174430ef256b73 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e53afd8114819093b57d86f8213311 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e478c16e0c8190b03966aa23c395a6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e484121cd48190bf583b4c94636a30 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:42 a.m.