Triple

T18553358
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Opportunistic Wireless Encryption E453437 entity
Predicate improvesSecurityComparedTo P29844 FINISHED
Object traditional open Wi‑Fi networks without encryption LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional open Wi‑Fi networks without encryption | Statement: [Opportunistic Wireless Encryption, improvesSecurityComparedTo, traditional open Wi‑Fi networks without encryption]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: improvesSecurityComparedTo
Context triple: [Opportunistic Wireless Encryption, improvesSecurityComparedTo, traditional open Wi‑Fi networks without encryption]
  • A. advantageOverPasswords
    Indicates that one method, system, or approach provides benefits or improvements compared to traditional password-based authentication.
  • B. isStrongerProtectionThan chosen
    Indicates that one form of protection provides a higher level of security, defense, or safeguarding compared to another.
  • C. securedAgainst
    Indicates that one entity is protected or safeguarded against threats, risks, or harmful actions originating from another entity or source.
  • D. securityGuarantee
    Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
  • E. securityReducesTo
    Indicates that the security of one system, protocol, or component can be formally reduced to (and thus is no stronger than) the security of another, typically better-understood, system or assumption.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d388b0c881908e610a1c45b52640 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e538027b94819082a4c4af66e170d7 completed April 19, 2026, 8:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e469e274a48190a570b25cfef4d890 completed April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:38 a.m.