Triple
T18529493
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Laravel Dusk |
E452797
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsAssertion |
P4133
|
FINISHED |
| Object | see text on page |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: see text on page | Statement: [Laravel Dusk, supportsAssertion, see text on page]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsAssertion Context triple: [Laravel Dusk, supportsAssertion, see text on page]
-
A.
supportsTheory
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
-
B.
supportsValidationOf
Indicates that one entity provides the mechanisms or conditions necessary for another entity to be checked or verified for correctness or compliance.
-
C.
supportsAspect
Indicates that one entity provides backing, justification, or reinforcement for a particular aspect, feature, or component of another entity.
-
D.
supportsClaim
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
-
E.
supportsProsecutionIn
Indicates that an entity provides assistance or backing to the prosecution side within a specified legal case or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d387b5548190aa030dad2cb4947e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e533fb940c81909d4ad9fc37f47829 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469e0025c81908f16ed4f922674af |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:37 a.m.