Triple
T18528424
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PHP command-line interface |
E452775
|
entity |
| Predicate | canUseConfigurationFileFrom |
P132019
|
FINISHED |
| Object | -c option |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: -c option | Statement: [PHP command-line interface, canUseConfigurationFileFrom, -c option]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canUseConfigurationFileFrom Context triple: [PHP command-line interface, canUseConfigurationFileFrom, -c option]
-
A.
hasConfigurationFile
Indicates that an entity is associated with or defined by a specific configuration file.
-
B.
supportsConfigurationFromEnv
Indicates that a component can obtain and apply its configuration settings directly from environment variables.
-
C.
hasConfiguration
Indicates that an entity is associated with or defined by a particular configuration or setup.
-
D.
canUseCustomMagicFile
Indicates that an entity is permitted to specify and operate with a non-default, user-defined magic file for processing or configuration purposes.
-
E.
hasConfigurationFormat
Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a specific configuration format for its settings or parameters.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d387b5548190aa030dad2cb4947e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e533fad2d081908395914d6a6b4eb1 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469e0025c81908f16ed4f922674af |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e46d2b93bc8190a6070018d7046547 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:37 a.m.