Triple
T18528222
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | XHP |
E452771
|
entity |
| Predicate | inspiredTechnologies |
P61774
|
FINISHED |
| Object | React JSX (conceptually related) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: React JSX (conceptually related) | Statement: [XHP, inspiredTechnologies, React JSX (conceptually related)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inspiredTechnologies Context triple: [XHP, inspiredTechnologies, React JSX (conceptually related)]
-
A.
influencedTechnology
chosen
Indicates that one entity has had a causal or shaping impact on the development, design, or use of a technological entity.
-
B.
technologyPioneered
Indicates that an entity was the first or among the first to develop, introduce, or significantly advance a particular technology.
-
C.
envisionedTechnology
Indicates that an entity has imagined, conceptualized, or planned a particular technology, typically before it exists or is realized.
-
D.
inspiredWorks
Indicates that one work served as a source of inspiration or creative influence for the creation or development of another work.
-
E.
inspiredDevelopmentOf
Indicates that one entity served as a motivating influence or creative stimulus leading to the development or creation of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d387b5548190aa030dad2cb4947e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e533fad2d081908395914d6a6b4eb1 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469e0025c81908f16ed4f922674af |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:37 a.m.