Triple
T18528195
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | XHP |
E452771
|
entity |
| Predicate | providesSyntax |
P38052
|
FINISHED |
| Object | XML-like syntax in PHP |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: XML-like syntax in PHP | Statement: [XHP, providesSyntax, XML-like syntax in PHP]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: providesSyntax Context triple: [XHP, providesSyntax, XML-like syntax in PHP]
-
A.
definesSyntax
chosen
Indicates that one entity specifies or determines the formal structure, rules, or grammar by which another entity is expressed or interpreted.
-
B.
explainsSyntaxElement
Indicates that one entity provides an explanation or clarification of the syntax or structural role of another element.
-
C.
providesMethodsFor
Indicates that one entity supplies or defines methods or functionalities that can be used or invoked by another entity.
-
D.
hasSyntaxInfluenceFrom
Indicates that the syntax of one entity is influenced, shaped, or derived from the syntax of another entity.
-
E.
commandSyntax
Indicates the specific structure or format in which a command must be written or expressed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d387b5548190aa030dad2cb4947e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e533f9bd1081909743b24e290b7dfe |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469e0025c81908f16ed4f922674af |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:37 a.m.