Triple
T18510967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Parliament of Saints |
E452340
|
entity |
| Predicate | politicalPeriod |
P110333
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Interregnum |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Interregnum | Statement: [Parliament of Saints, politicalPeriod, Interregnum]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: politicalPeriod Context triple: [Parliament of Saints, politicalPeriod, Interregnum]
-
A.
politicalHistory
Indicates that there exists a historical political relationship, involvement, or background connecting the entities, such as past offices held, affiliations, or political events linking them.
-
B.
operatedInPoliticalPeriod
chosen
Indicates that an entity carried out its activities or functions during a specified political period or regime.
-
C.
occupationPeriod
Indicates the time span during which an entity holds or held a particular occupation or role.
-
D.
politicalSystemHistorical
Indicates a relationship where a political system is characterized or analyzed in terms of its historical development, context, or evolution.
-
E.
periodOfRule
Indicates the span of time during which an entity exercised authority, control, or governance over something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d386df84819092355ebb260d848e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5334640888190bd44bc15e97822d3 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469dbf5208190b6fc49e02a087f54 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:36 a.m.