Triple

T18509988
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Parker v. Davis E452312 entity
Predicate relatedToCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Knox v. Lee — NE NERFINISHED

Named-entity recognition

Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.

Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Knox v. Lee | Statement: [Parker v. Davis, relatedToCase, Knox v. Lee]

Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Knox v. Lee
Context triple: [Parker v. Davis, relatedToCase, Knox v. Lee]
  • A. Knox v. Lee chosen
    Knox v. Lee was an 1871 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal government's power to issue paper money as legal tender, reversing the earlier Hepburn v. Griswold ruling.
  • B. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • C. Kentucky v. Dennison
    Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
  • D. Tennessee v. Lane
    Tennessee v. Lane is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to require states to provide accessible courthouses under the Americans with Disabilities Act as a valid enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • E. Allen v. Milligan
    Allen v. Milligan is a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed and strengthened protections against racial vote dilution in redistricting under the Voting Rights Act.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69d8d386df84819092355ebb260d848e elicitation completed
NER batch_69e533457e608190988304bf8bc2db1c ner completed
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:36 a.m.