Triple

T18509942
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Knox v. Lee E452311 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Juilliard v. Greenman — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Juilliard v. Greenman | Statement: [Knox v. Lee, relatedCase, Juilliard v. Greenman]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Juilliard v. Greenman
Context triple: [Knox v. Lee, relatedCase, Juilliard v. Greenman]
  • A. Juilliard v. Greenman chosen
    Juilliard v. Greenman is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government's power to issue paper money as legal tender in peacetime under its constitutional monetary powers.
  • B. Colegrove v. Green
    Colegrove v. Green is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court decision known for holding that issues of legislative apportionment and malapportionment were nonjusticiable political questions, delaying judicial intervention in redistricting disputes.
  • C. Connick v. Myers
    Connick v. Myers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited public employees’ First Amendment protections by holding that their speech is only constitutionally protected when it addresses matters of public concern rather than personal workplace grievances.
  • D. Apprendi v. New Jersey
    Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • E. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
    Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court copyright case that held the equitable doctrine of laches cannot bar claims for damages brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d386df84819092355ebb260d848e completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e533457e608190988304bf8bc2db1c completed April 19, 2026, 7:55 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:36 a.m.