Triple

T18506550
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Net Promoter Score E452210 entity
Predicate relationalNPSMeasures P48179 FINISHED
Object overall relationship with a company LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overall relationship with a company | Statement: [Net Promoter Score, relationalNPSMeasures, overall relationship with a company]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationalNPSMeasures
Context triple: [Net Promoter Score, relationalNPSMeasures, overall relationship with a company]
  • A. crowdReputation
    Indicates the collective opinion or perceived standing of an entity as judged by a group or general audience.
  • B. ratingContext chosen
    Indicates the situational or contextual factors under which a rating is given or applies.
  • C. associatedSurvey
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected to a specific survey, typically as the survey that applies to, evaluates, or is used in conjunction with that entity.
  • D. surveyBand
    Indicates that an entity conducts or is associated with a survey using a specific observational band or frequency range.
  • E. surveyName
    Indicates the specific name or title assigned to a survey in the context of the relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d386df84819092355ebb260d848e completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5334266708190b59aca3a2218c095 completed April 19, 2026, 7:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e469dbf5208190b6fc49e02a087f54 completed April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:36 a.m.