Triple
T18491625
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Book 5 (De revolutionibus orbium coelestium) |
E451829
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliesTheoryOf |
P7760
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sun-centered planetary system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sun-centered planetary system | Statement: [Book 5 (De revolutionibus orbium coelestium), appliesTheoryOf, Sun-centered planetary system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesTheoryOf Context triple: [Book 5 (De revolutionibus orbium coelestium), appliesTheoryOf, Sun-centered planetary system]
-
A.
appliesTheory
chosen
Indicates that an entity uses or implements a particular theory in analyzing, explaining, or addressing something.
-
B.
hasTheory
Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is characterized by a particular theory.
-
C.
followsTheoryOf
Indicates that one entity adheres to, is based on, or is guided by the theoretical framework or principles established by another entity.
-
D.
presentsTheory
Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or explains a theory to another entity or audience.
-
E.
supportsTheory
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d3855d50819097fc8561b0299dd9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e531dcac3c8190b2ebd129ca7f368d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469d671088190b619de96ea6f92ab |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:35 a.m.