Triple
T18483494
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lyrical Wizardry |
E451625
|
entity |
| Predicate | creativeContext |
P131831
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Conspiracy project |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Conspiracy project | Statement: [Lyrical Wizardry, creativeContext, Conspiracy project]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: creativeContext Context triple: [Lyrical Wizardry, creativeContext, Conspiracy project]
-
A.
creativeScope
Indicates the range or domain within which an entity is allowed or intended to exercise creativity or generate original content.
-
B.
creativeOutput
Indicates that an entity produces, originates, or is responsible for a creative work or result.
-
C.
creativeLanguage
Indicates that an entity uses language in an original, imaginative, or non-literal way to express ideas.
-
D.
creativeInfluence
Indicates that one entity has shaped, inspired, or informed the creative work, style, or ideas of another entity.
-
E.
creativeUniverse
Indicates a relationship where an entity is responsible for originating, shaping, or imaginatively generating a universe or complete world.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38465a0819099b9b42d2a662ac1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e531d5951c81909f44362bc4101333 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469d671088190b619de96ea6f92ab |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e46d2aa72c8190a40854a7a52081e2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:35 a.m.