Triple

T18479924
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject twin prime conjecture E451529 entity
Predicate knownEvidence P3650 FINISHED
Object numerical verification for very large ranges of integers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: numerical verification for very large ranges of integers | Statement: [twin prime conjecture, knownEvidence, numerical verification for very large ranges of integers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: knownEvidence
Context triple: [twin prime conjecture, knownEvidence, numerical verification for very large ranges of integers]
  • A. providesEvidenceFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
  • B. knows
    Indicates that one entity has knowledge or awareness of another entity or piece of information.
  • C. knownFrom
    Indicates that one entity is aware of, has learned about, or recognizes another entity through a specified source, context, or medium.
  • D. historicalEvidence
    Indicates that there exists documented or otherwise verifiable information supporting the occurrence, authenticity, or truth of a past event, state, or relationship between entities.
  • E. hasMaterialEvidence
    Indicates that there exists tangible, physical evidence supporting or associated with a particular entity, event, or claim.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38465a0819099b9b42d2a662ac1 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e53066a7108190a50eda9b489c90ca completed April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e469d671088190b619de96ea6f92ab completed April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:35 a.m.