Triple

T18479904
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject twin prime conjecture E451529 entity
Predicate doesNotClaim P131817 FINISHED
Object formula for twin primes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: formula for twin primes | Statement: [twin prime conjecture, doesNotClaim, formula for twin primes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doesNotClaim
Context triple: [twin prime conjecture, doesNotClaim, formula for twin primes]
  • A. doesNot
    Indicates that a specified entity lacks, refrains from, or fails to perform a particular action or exhibit a particular property in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. doesNotHave
    Indicates that one entity lacks, is missing, or is not in possession of another entity or attribute.
  • C. doesNotImply
    Indicates that the truth of one statement or condition does not guarantee or lead to the truth of another statement or condition.
  • D. didNotHold
    Indicates that an expected event, condition, or relationship failed to occur or be valid.
  • E. doesNotIssue
    Indicates that one entity refrains from or fails to produce, grant, or distribute something (such as a document, order, or resource) to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38465a0819099b9b42d2a662ac1 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e53066a7108190a50eda9b489c90ca completed April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e469d671088190b619de96ea6f92ab completed April 19, 2026, 5:36 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e46d2aa72c8190a40854a7a52081e2 completed April 19, 2026, 5:50 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:35 a.m.