Triple

T18467727
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gex canton E451207 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Sauverny NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sauverny | Statement: [Gex canton, contains, Sauverny]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sauverny
Context triple: [Gex canton, contains, Sauverny]
  • A. Sauverny chosen
    Sauverny is a small commune in eastern France’s Ain department, near the Swiss border and the Geneva metropolitan area.
  • B. Souvigny
    Souvigny is a historic town in central France known for its important Cluniac priory and medieval religious heritage.
  • C. Yerville
    Yerville is a small commune in the Seine-Maritime department of the Normandy region in northern France.
  • D. Chauvigny
    Chauvigny is a historic town in western France known for its medieval fortifications and picturesque setting in the Vienne department of the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region.
  • E. Vallentigny
    Vallentigny is a small French commune located in the Aube department in the Grand Est region of north-central France.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38465a0819099b9b42d2a662ac1 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e52a8459f88190a54cae4c8cb05119 completed April 19, 2026, 7:18 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:34 a.m.