Triple
T18461310
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edward Clarke |
E451040
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCase |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Regina v. Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Regina v. Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor | Statement: [Edward Clarke, notableCase, Regina v. Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Regina v. Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor Context triple: [Edward Clarke, notableCase, Regina v. Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor]
-
A.
Oscar Wilde libel trial
chosen
The Oscar Wilde libel trial was the 1895 court case in which playwright Oscar Wilde sued the Marquess of Queensberry for libel, leading to Wilde’s own prosecution and conviction for “gross indecency” and his subsequent downfall.
-
B.
Gross Indecency: The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde
Gross Indecency: The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde is a documentary-style play by Moisés Kaufman that dramatizes the real-life trials and persecution of writer Oscar Wilde for his homosexuality in late 19th-century England.
-
C.
Wilde v. Queensberry (1895)
Wilde v. Queensberry (1895) was the high-profile libel trial in which Oscar Wilde sued the Marquess of Queensberry, ultimately leading to Wilde’s own prosecution and imprisonment for gross indecency.
-
D.
Ruskin v. Whistler libel case
The Ruskin v. Whistler libel case was an 1878 British lawsuit in which American-born artist James McNeill Whistler sued influential critic John Ruskin for defamation over a harsh review of his painting, highlighting tensions between avant-garde art and traditional criticism.
-
E.
Regina v. Bradlaugh and Besant
Regina v. Bradlaugh and Besant was a landmark 1877 English obscenity trial in which Charles Bradlaugh and Annie Besant were prosecuted for publishing a birth control pamphlet, sparking major public debate over contraception and freedom of the press.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38345688190b565eac2e4cd7935 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e52a7fd9e081909bdf5c4aec2ba08d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:33 a.m.