Triple

T18458760
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Alfred Tarski E450973 entity
Predicate notableIdea P4 FINISHED
Object consequence operator in logic NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consequence operator in logic | Statement: [Alfred Tarski, notableIdea, consequence operator in logic]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: consequence operator in logic
Context triple: [Alfred Tarski, notableIdea, consequence operator in logic]
  • A. On the Concept of Logical Consequence
    "On the Concept of Logical Consequence" is Alfred Tarski’s seminal 1936 essay that formally characterizes logical consequence using model-theoretic semantics and helped shape modern logic and philosophy of language.
  • B. On the Concept of Following Logically
    "On the Concept of Following Logically" is a seminal philosophical essay by Alfred Tarski that rigorously analyzes the notion of logical consequence and its formal characterization.
  • C. Anderson–Belnap relevant logics
    Anderson–Belnap relevant logics are a family of non-classical logics that require premises to be relevant to conclusions, developed by Alan Anderson and Nuel Belnap as a formal alternative to classical implication.
  • D. sequent calculus
    Sequent calculus is a formal logical system introduced by Gerhard Gentzen that represents deductions as sequences (sequents) to analyze and structure proofs, especially in proof theory and logic.
  • E. routley star semantics
    Routley star semantics is a possible-worlds-style semantic framework for relevant and paraconsistent logics that uses a special “star” operation on worlds to model negation without explosion.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: consequence operator in logic
Target entity description: The consequence operator in logic is a formal, Tarski-style mapping from sets of sentences to their logical consequences, capturing the notion of logical entailment in an abstract, algebraic way.
  • A. On the Concept of Logical Consequence
    "On the Concept of Logical Consequence" is Alfred Tarski’s seminal 1936 essay that formally characterizes logical consequence using model-theoretic semantics and helped shape modern logic and philosophy of language.
  • B. On the Concept of Following Logically
    "On the Concept of Following Logically" is a seminal philosophical essay by Alfred Tarski that rigorously analyzes the notion of logical consequence and its formal characterization.
  • C. Anderson–Belnap relevant logics
    Anderson–Belnap relevant logics are a family of non-classical logics that require premises to be relevant to conclusions, developed by Alan Anderson and Nuel Belnap as a formal alternative to classical implication.
  • D. sequent calculus
    Sequent calculus is a formal logical system introduced by Gerhard Gentzen that represents deductions as sequences (sequents) to analyze and structure proofs, especially in proof theory and logic.
  • E. routley star semantics
    Routley star semantics is a possible-worlds-style semantic framework for relevant and paraconsistent logics that uses a special “star” operation on worlds to model negation without explosion.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38345688190b565eac2e4cd7935 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e52a7cdb5c8190a399f0e4052f7d1f completed April 19, 2026, 7:18 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:33 a.m.