Triple
T18458760
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alfred Tarski |
E450973
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableIdea |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | consequence operator in logic |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consequence operator in logic | Statement: [Alfred Tarski, notableIdea, consequence operator in logic]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: consequence operator in logic Context triple: [Alfred Tarski, notableIdea, consequence operator in logic]
-
A.
On the Concept of Logical Consequence
"On the Concept of Logical Consequence" is Alfred Tarski’s seminal 1936 essay that formally characterizes logical consequence using model-theoretic semantics and helped shape modern logic and philosophy of language.
-
B.
On the Concept of Following Logically
"On the Concept of Following Logically" is a seminal philosophical essay by Alfred Tarski that rigorously analyzes the notion of logical consequence and its formal characterization.
-
C.
Anderson–Belnap relevant logics
Anderson–Belnap relevant logics are a family of non-classical logics that require premises to be relevant to conclusions, developed by Alan Anderson and Nuel Belnap as a formal alternative to classical implication.
-
D.
sequent calculus
Sequent calculus is a formal logical system introduced by Gerhard Gentzen that represents deductions as sequences (sequents) to analyze and structure proofs, especially in proof theory and logic.
-
E.
routley star semantics
Routley star semantics is a possible-worlds-style semantic framework for relevant and paraconsistent logics that uses a special “star” operation on worlds to model negation without explosion.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: consequence operator in logic Target entity description: The consequence operator in logic is a formal, Tarski-style mapping from sets of sentences to their logical consequences, capturing the notion of logical entailment in an abstract, algebraic way.
-
A.
On the Concept of Logical Consequence
"On the Concept of Logical Consequence" is Alfred Tarski’s seminal 1936 essay that formally characterizes logical consequence using model-theoretic semantics and helped shape modern logic and philosophy of language.
-
B.
On the Concept of Following Logically
"On the Concept of Following Logically" is a seminal philosophical essay by Alfred Tarski that rigorously analyzes the notion of logical consequence and its formal characterization.
-
C.
Anderson–Belnap relevant logics
Anderson–Belnap relevant logics are a family of non-classical logics that require premises to be relevant to conclusions, developed by Alan Anderson and Nuel Belnap as a formal alternative to classical implication.
-
D.
sequent calculus
Sequent calculus is a formal logical system introduced by Gerhard Gentzen that represents deductions as sequences (sequents) to analyze and structure proofs, especially in proof theory and logic.
-
E.
routley star semantics
Routley star semantics is a possible-worlds-style semantic framework for relevant and paraconsistent logics that uses a special “star” operation on worlds to model negation without explosion.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38345688190b565eac2e4cd7935 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e52a7cdb5c8190a399f0e4052f7d1f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:33 a.m.