Triple

T18434262
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Guerin v. The Queen E450350 entity
Predicate influencedCase P1994 FINISHED
Object R. v. Sparrow — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R. v. Sparrow | Statement: [Guerin v. The Queen, influencedCase, R. v. Sparrow]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: R. v. Sparrow
Context triple: [Guerin v. The Queen, influencedCase, R. v. Sparrow]
  • A. R. v. Sparrow chosen
    R. v. Sparrow is a landmark 1990 Supreme Court of Canada decision that affirmed and clarified the constitutional protection of Indigenous fishing rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
  • B. R. v. Van der Peet
    R. v. Van der Peet is a landmark 1996 Supreme Court of Canada decision that defined the test for recognizing and affirming Aboriginal rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
  • C. Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
    Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
  • D. R. v. Nikal
    R. v. Nikal is a Supreme Court of Canada decision that further clarified the scope of Aboriginal fishing rights and the Crown’s fiduciary obligations following the landmark R. v. Sparrow ruling.
  • E. R. v. Lavell
    R. v. Lavell is a landmark 1974 Supreme Court of Canada decision that addressed sex discrimination in the Indian Act and tested the scope and effectiveness of the Canadian Bill of Rights in protecting equality rights.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d381d6388190a9e94e9c658174e4 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e51b1915d88190a1ecd81cd78ee7d2 completed April 19, 2026, 6:12 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:28 a.m.