Triple

T18434233
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Guerin v. The Queen E450350 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Guerin et al. v. The Queen NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Guerin et al. v. The Queen | Statement: [Guerin v. The Queen, fullCaseName, Guerin et al. v. The Queen]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Guerin et al. v. The Queen
Context triple: [Guerin v. The Queen, fullCaseName, Guerin et al. v. The Queen]
  • A. Guerin v. The Queen chosen
    Guerin v. The Queen is a landmark 1984 Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the federal government’s fiduciary duty toward Indigenous peoples in its management of reserve lands.
  • B. X v. Rex
    X v. Rex is a classic detective novel by Philip MacDonald featuring a tense murder investigation and intricate courtroom drama.
  • C. R. v. Lavell
    R. v. Lavell is a landmark 1974 Supreme Court of Canada decision that addressed sex discrimination in the Indian Act and tested the scope and effectiveness of the Canadian Bill of Rights in protecting equality rights.
  • D. R. v. Drybones
    R. v. Drybones is a landmark 1970 Supreme Court of Canada decision that strengthened the Canadian Bill of Rights by ruling that a law discriminating against an Indigenous person was inoperative because it violated equality rights.
  • E. R v Oakes
    R v Oakes is a landmark 1986 Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the proportionality framework used to justify limits on rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d381d6388190a9e94e9c658174e4 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e51b1915d88190a1ecd81cd78ee7d2 completed April 19, 2026, 6:12 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:28 a.m.