Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: R. v. Gladstone | Statement: [R. v. Sparrow, precedentFor, R. v. Gladstone]

Target entity: R. v. Gladstone
Context triple: [R. v. Sparrow, precedentFor, R. v. Gladstone]

• A. R. v. Van der Peet
  R. v. Van der Peet is a landmark 1996 Supreme Court of Canada decision that defined the test for recognizing and affirming Aboriginal rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
• B. R. v. Lavell
  R. v. Lavell is a landmark 1974 Supreme Court of Canada decision that addressed sex discrimination in the Indian Act and tested the scope and effectiveness of the Canadian Bill of Rights in protecting equality rights.
• C. R. v. Nikal chosen
  R. v. Nikal is a Supreme Court of Canada decision that further clarified the scope of Aboriginal fishing rights and the Crown’s fiduciary obligations following the landmark R. v. Sparrow ruling.
• D. Guerin v. The Queen
  Guerin v. The Queen is a landmark 1984 Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the federal government’s fiduciary duty toward Indigenous peoples in its management of reserve lands.
• E. R. v. Sparrow
  R. v. Sparrow is a landmark 1990 Supreme Court of Canada decision that affirmed and clarified the constitutional protection of Indigenous fishing rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.