Triple

T18421156
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rainy Day, Dream Away E442024 entity
Predicate hasCallAndResponseStyle P22739 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Rainy Day, Dream Away, hasCallAndResponseStyle, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCallAndResponseStyle
Context triple: [Rainy Day, Dream Away, hasCallAndResponseStyle, true]
  • A. hasCallAndResponseStructure chosen
    Indicates that one element initiates a call and another element provides a corresponding response, forming a paired, back-and-forth structural pattern.
  • B. hasCall
    Indicates that one entity initiates or participates in a telephone or voice communication with another entity.
  • C. hasCallAndResponseVocals
    Indicates that one entity produces vocalizations that are followed by corresponding or answering vocalizations from another entity.
  • D. featuresCallAndResponse
    Indicates that one entity includes or exhibits a call-and-response interaction or structure involving another entity.
  • E. callingStyle
    Indicates the manner or convention by which one entity initiates or performs a call or invocation on another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9eb8a508190a942fd75ebd8b1dc completed April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e51a2be6bc8190b2812f77ff4cc960 completed April 19, 2026, 6:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e469bf7f74819096a01173493412c2 completed April 19, 2026, 5:35 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:47 a.m.