Triple
T18414128
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | assassination of Olof Palme |
E441842
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalOutcomeForChristerPettersson |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | convicted in district court in 1989 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: convicted in district court in 1989 | Statement: [assassination of Olof Palme, legalOutcomeForChristerPettersson, convicted in district court in 1989]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalOutcomeForChristerPettersson Context triple: [assassination of Olof Palme, legalOutcomeForChristerPettersson, convicted in district court in 1989]
-
A.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalCaseHeParticipatedInDecidedBy
Indicates that a legal case in which he participated was decided or adjudicated by a specified authority or court.
-
C.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
-
D.
laterCourt
Indicates that one court decision or proceeding occurs at a later time than another court decision or proceeding.
-
E.
decisionCourt
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9eb8a508190a942fd75ebd8b1dc |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e51a26d268819098e6791dc98efcda |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e469bf7f74819096a01173493412c2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:47 a.m.