Triple

T18398934
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nasatyas E449939 entity
Predicate epithetUsage P104657 FINISHED
Object dual form referring to both Ashvins together LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dual form referring to both Ashvins together | Statement: [Nasatyas, epithetUsage, dual form referring to both Ashvins together]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: epithetUsage
Context triple: [Nasatyas, epithetUsage, dual form referring to both Ashvins together]
  • A. epithetAppliedBy
    Indicates that a particular epithet or descriptive label is used or assigned by a specific agent to a target entity.
  • B. epithetScope chosen
    Indicates that an epithet (a descriptive label or phrase) applies specifically within a defined contextual scope or domain for the referenced entity or relation.
  • C. hasMeaningOfEpithet
    Indicates that one entity expresses or conveys the meaning or sense of another entity’s epithet.
  • D. languageOfEpithet
    Indicates the language in which an epithet (such as a descriptive or honorary title) is expressed.
  • E. associatedWithEpithet
    Indicates that an entity is linked to or described by a particular epithet or descriptive label.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9fab8a8819086a9ddc0871715e0 completed April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e518499b1481909c5de786c48faeba completed April 19, 2026, 6 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e44ff1f92c8190afbb8e85d12bf2a9 completed April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:46 a.m.