Triple
T18392905
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thiesi |
E449781
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAgriculturalTraditions |
P130952
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Thiesi, hasAgriculturalTraditions, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAgriculturalTraditions Context triple: [Thiesi, hasAgriculturalTraditions, true]
-
A.
hasAgriculturalCommunities
Indicates that certain groups or settlements engage in organized farming and related agricultural activities within a given area or context.
-
B.
hasAgriculturalProduction
Indicates that an entity engages in or is characterized by the production of agricultural goods such as crops or livestock.
-
C.
agriculturalPractice
Indicates a relationship where an entity engages in, applies, or is associated with a specific method or technique of agriculture or farming.
-
D.
hasAgriculturalCharacter
Indicates that something possesses qualities, features, or uses typical of agriculture or farming activities.
-
E.
agriculturalDependence
Indicates that one entity relies on another for agricultural resources, production, or support.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9fab8a8819086a9ddc0871715e0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e51844c1ec81909ec215db9b29612d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44ff1f92c8190afbb8e85d12bf2a9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e451a1bda48190a9cd1db436d4be62 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:46 a.m.