Triple
T18372069
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CTEA |
E446204
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalChallengeOutcome |
P76353
|
FINISHED |
| Object | upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court | Statement: [CTEA, constitutionalChallengeOutcome, upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalChallengeOutcome Context triple: [CTEA, constitutionalChallengeOutcome, upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court]
-
A.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
B.
constitutionalRuling
chosen
Indicates a formal judicial decision determining whether a law, policy, or government action complies with a constitution.
-
C.
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
-
D.
doctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
-
E.
precedentChallenged
Indicates that an existing legal precedent is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f370b88190b1e5081c2c238e7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e51754539c819083f13b85cacb6cce |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44fed3fdc81908f4ed6a81db42416 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:44 a.m.