Triple
T18350696
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Court Painter Titorelli |
E439659
|
entity |
| Predicate | describesLegalOutcome |
P22390
|
FINISHED |
| Object | genuine acquittal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: genuine acquittal | Statement: [The Court Painter Titorelli, describesLegalOutcome, genuine acquittal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: describesLegalOutcome Context triple: [The Court Painter Titorelli, describesLegalOutcome, genuine acquittal]
-
A.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
describesOutcomeOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity specifies or characterizes the result, consequence, or outcome produced by another entity or process.
-
C.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
D.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
-
E.
outcomeOfTrial
Indicates that a particular result or verdict is produced as the consequence of a specific trial or legal proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b918221c8190a9f7b563d64ac677 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e514f83b648190b473cf611851c666 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44fe91bc08190906518e1b120fcf0 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:37 a.m.