Triple
T18310527
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cecil Cunningham |
E438611
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFamilyName |
P18
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cunningham |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cunningham | Statement: [Cecil Cunningham, hasFamilyName, Cunningham]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cunningham Context triple: [Cecil Cunningham, hasFamilyName, Cunningham]
-
A.
Cunningham
Cunningham is an Australian federal electoral division in New South Wales that includes coastal communities such as Thirroul and parts of the Illawarra region.
-
B.
Cunningham
chosen
Cunningham is a common Scottish surname borne by numerous notable individuals across fields such as technology, politics, sports, and the arts.
-
C.
Cuninghamme
Cuninghamme is an alternative historical or variant spelling of the surname Cunningham, a Scottish family name associated with the region of Ayrshire.
-
D.
Cooley
Cooley was a party in the landmark 1852 U.S. Supreme Court case Cooley v. Board of Wardens, which helped define the scope of state versus federal power over commerce.
-
E.
Pittman
Pittman is a surname of English origin borne by various notable individuals across politics, sports, and the arts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b915e3e881909125d760c15d0c29 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e502180d208190ae7c4f3d0ef3dc55 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:36 a.m.