Triple
T18307794
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Waipā River |
E438534
|
entity |
| Predicate | flowsThrough |
P225
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pirongia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pirongia | Statement: [Waipā River, flowsThrough, Pirongia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pirongia Context triple: [Waipā River, flowsThrough, Pirongia]
-
A.
Pirongia
chosen
Pirongia is a rural village in the Waikato region of New Zealand, situated near Mount Pirongia and functioning as a small community within the wider Hamilton area.
-
B.
Waugorah
Waugorah is a rural locality within New South Wales, Australia, administered as part of the Carrathool Shire local government area.
-
C.
Paretetaitonga
Paretetaitonga is one of the principal summits on Mount Ruapehu, a major active stratovolcano in New Zealand’s central North Island.
-
D.
Ngarigu
Ngarigu are an Aboriginal Australian people traditionally associated with the Monaro and surrounding alpine regions of southeastern New South Wales and northeastern Victoria.
-
E.
Paremata
Paremata is a coastal suburb of Porirua in the Wellington region of New Zealand, known for its harbour views and proximity to key transport routes.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b915e3e881909125d760c15d0c29 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e50215e0c48190a4679d432b6ee596 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:25 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:35 a.m.