Triple

T18298924
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject British Interplanetary Society E438303 entity
Predicate notableProject P4 FINISHED
Object BIS Lunar Lander study NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: BIS Lunar Lander study | Statement: [British Interplanetary Society, notableProject, BIS Lunar Lander study]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: BIS Lunar Lander study
Context triple: [British Interplanetary Society, notableProject, BIS Lunar Lander study]
  • A. Blue Moon lunar lander program
    The Blue Moon lunar lander program is Blue Origin’s initiative to develop reusable robotic and crewed landers designed to deliver cargo and astronauts to the Moon’s surface in support of sustained lunar exploration.
  • B. Altair lunar lander
    The Altair lunar lander was NASA’s planned next-generation crewed spacecraft for landing astronauts on the Moon as part of the post-Apollo Constellation program.
  • C. SLIM lunar lander
    The SLIM lunar lander is a Japanese spacecraft designed by JAXA to demonstrate high-precision, lightweight landing technology on the Moon’s surface.
  • D. Surveyor lunar lander spacecraft systems
    Surveyor lunar lander spacecraft systems were the robotic lunar landing hardware developed in the 1960s for NASA’s Surveyor program, which performed the first successful soft landings and surface studies on the Moon to support Apollo mission planning.
  • E. Lunar Lander Challenge
    The Lunar Lander Challenge was a NASA-sponsored competition that encouraged private teams to develop and demonstrate reusable rocket-powered vehicles capable of simulating lunar lander missions.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: BIS Lunar Lander study
Target entity description: The BIS Lunar Lander study was a pioneering conceptual design project by the British Interplanetary Society that explored early engineering and mission architectures for a crewed lunar landing.
  • A. Blue Moon lunar lander program
    The Blue Moon lunar lander program is Blue Origin’s initiative to develop reusable robotic and crewed landers designed to deliver cargo and astronauts to the Moon’s surface in support of sustained lunar exploration.
  • B. Altair lunar lander
    The Altair lunar lander was NASA’s planned next-generation crewed spacecraft for landing astronauts on the Moon as part of the post-Apollo Constellation program.
  • C. SLIM lunar lander
    The SLIM lunar lander is a Japanese spacecraft designed by JAXA to demonstrate high-precision, lightweight landing technology on the Moon’s surface.
  • D. Surveyor lunar lander spacecraft systems
    Surveyor lunar lander spacecraft systems were the robotic lunar landing hardware developed in the 1960s for NASA’s Surveyor program, which performed the first successful soft landings and surface studies on the Moon to support Apollo mission planning.
  • E. Lunar Lander Challenge
    The Lunar Lander Challenge was a NASA-sponsored competition that encouraged private teams to develop and demonstrate reusable rocket-powered vehicles capable of simulating lunar lander missions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b915e3e881909125d760c15d0c29 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5017d96588190ac1e326803142976 completed April 19, 2026, 4:23 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:35 a.m.