Triple
T18289696
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Ace of Hearts (1921 film) |
E438077
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSurvivingPrints |
P131206
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [The Ace of Hearts (1921 film), hasSurvivingPrints, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSurvivingPrints Context triple: [The Ace of Hearts (1921 film), hasSurvivingPrints, yes]
-
A.
hasSurvivingOriginals
Indicates that some of the original instances or versions of an entity still exist and have not been lost, destroyed, or replaced.
-
B.
hasPrintedMaterials
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with physical printed materials (such as books, brochures, or documents).
-
C.
hasNotableImprints
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more imprints (such as publishing or branding sub-labels) that are considered notable or significant.
-
D.
hasLostWorks
Indicates that an entity has created works that are no longer extant, missing, or have not survived.
-
E.
hadImprint
Indicates that one entity bears or once bore a physical or symbolic mark, stamp, or impression produced by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b914530c8190b4474d862a2b2a1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e500fd65888190afdbb29dc60066af |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44fdf43d08190bbcfb6b1fe3cc0ee |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e451a0ba208190a5fe92832a8f7a49 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:35 a.m.