Triple
T18283809
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yick Wo |
E437928
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalOutcomeSignificance |
P12084
|
FINISHED |
| Object | established that laws applied with unequal impact can violate the Equal Protection Clause |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: established that laws applied with unequal impact can violate the Equal Protection Clause | Statement: [Yick Wo, legalOutcomeSignificance, established that laws applied with unequal impact can violate the Equal Protection Clause]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalOutcomeSignificance Context triple: [Yick Wo, legalOutcomeSignificance, established that laws applied with unequal impact can violate the Equal Protection Clause]
-
A.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalSignificance
chosen
Indicates that something has recognized importance, effect, or consequence within a legal context or system.
-
C.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
D.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
-
E.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b914530c8190b4474d862a2b2a1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e500f7ff088190933bb8f403ce7f9c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44fd81c788190b08c6be3b07a08c5 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:35 a.m.