Triple

T18281251
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SIV mode E437867 entity
Predicate belongsToSubfield P131163 FINISHED
Object symmetric-key cryptography LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: symmetric-key cryptography | Statement: [SIV mode, belongsToSubfield, symmetric-key cryptography]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: belongsToSubfield
Context triple: [SIV mode, belongsToSubfield, symmetric-key cryptography]
  • A. containsAsSubfield
    Indicates that one field or data structure includes another field as a nested or component subfield within it.
  • B. belongsToSubseries
    Indicates that one item is part of, or contained within, a more specific subseries of a larger series or collection.
  • C. belongsToSubfamily
    Indicates that one entity is a member of, or classified within, a specific subfamily of another entity.
  • D. belongsToSubsector
    Indicates that one entity is part of, or classified within, a more specific subsector of a broader sector or industry.
  • E. hasSubproperty
    Indicates that one property is a more specific version of another property, inheriting its meaning and constraints.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b914530c8190b4474d862a2b2a1b completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e50056ea0481908d66bf263ac80c75 completed April 19, 2026, 4:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e44fd81c788190b08c6be3b07a08c5 completed April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e451a0ba208190a5fe92832a8f7a49 completed April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:35 a.m.