Triple
T18272213
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Perez |
E437641
|
entity |
| Predicate | listedInGenealogy |
P46883
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ruth 4:18–22 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ruth 4:18–22 | Statement: [Perez, listedInGenealogy, Ruth 4:18–22]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: listedInGenealogy Context triple: [Perez, listedInGenealogy, Ruth 4:18–22]
-
A.
hasGenealogicalSignificance
Indicates that something holds importance or relevance within a genealogical or family-lineage context.
-
B.
hasGenealogicalInterest
Indicates a relationship in which one entity has a research, documentation, or personal interest in the family history or lineage of another entity.
-
C.
genealogicalFunction
Indicates a genealogical relationship or role that one entity holds in relation to another within a family or ancestry structure.
-
D.
genealogicalDocumentation
chosen
Indicates that there exists recorded evidence or documentation establishing a genealogical relationship between entities.
-
E.
genealogicalDescription
Indicates a textual description that explains the genealogical relationships or lineage connections among entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b914530c8190b4474d862a2b2a1b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5004f0e7c8190a7206e193012a2d3 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44fd81c788190b08c6be3b07a08c5 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:34 a.m.