Triple

T18268021
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Buffalo nickel E437533 entity
Predicate reverseSubject P9300 FINISHED
Object American bison (often called buffalo) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: American bison (often called buffalo) | Statement: [Buffalo nickel, reverseSubject, American bison (often called buffalo)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reverseSubject
Context triple: [Buffalo nickel, reverseSubject, American bison (often called buffalo)]
  • A. reverseDesignSubject
    Indicates that the subject is the entity for which a design or plan is derived by reversing or backtracking from an existing outcome or artifact.
  • B. reversed chosen
    Indicates that the direction or order of a previously defined relationship or sequence between entities is inverted.
  • C. reverseFeature
    Indicates that one feature is the inverse or opposite counterpart of another feature in a given context.
  • D. alsoReveres
    Indicates that one entity holds reverence or deep respect for something or someone that another entity also reveres.
  • E. typicalReverseType
    Indicates that the subject is the usual or canonical inverse relation type of the given predicate.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b913351c8190932b6a426de04b41 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4ff7bda5c8190a5a85f3cfb7aa4ef completed April 19, 2026, 4:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e44fd81c788190b08c6be3b07a08c5 completed April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:34 a.m.