Triple
T18265289
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | WCON |
E437467
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStationName |
P8935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | West Concord |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: West Concord | Statement: [WCON, hasStationName, West Concord]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: West Concord Context triple: [WCON, hasStationName, West Concord]
-
A.
West Concord
chosen
West Concord is a village and commuter rail stop in Concord, Massachusetts, serving as a suburban residential and transit hub west of Boston.
-
B.
North Concord
North Concord is a neighborhood in Concord, California, located in the northern part of the city and primarily served by the North Concord/Martinez BART station.
-
C.
Concord West
Concord West is a residential suburb in Sydney, New South Wales, known for its family-friendly streets, parks, and convenient transport links to the city.
-
D.
Northwood
Northwood is a suburban London Underground station in the London Borough of Hillingdon, providing commuter rail services on the Metropolitan line.
-
E.
Northwood
Northwood is a small rural city located in Grand Forks County in northeastern North Dakota, United States.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b913351c8190932b6a426de04b41 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4ff79851481909a4bbeb14fb00647 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:34 a.m.