Triple
T18260720
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marwood |
E437345
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipDynamicWithWithnail |
P39999
|
FINISHED |
| Object | more responsible |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: more responsible | Statement: [Marwood, relationshipDynamicWithWithnail, more responsible]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipDynamicWithWithnail Context triple: [Marwood, relationshipDynamicWithWithnail, more responsible]
-
A.
relationshipDynamic
chosen
Indicates a changing or evolving pattern of interaction between entities, such as shifts in their roles, closeness, or influence over time.
-
B.
relationshipType
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
C.
basisOfRelationship
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational reason, cause, or justification for the relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
D.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
E.
laterRelationshipWith
Indicates that one entity has a relationship with another that occurs at a later time relative to some reference point or prior relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b913351c8190932b6a426de04b41 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4ff7591b4819083f2b29d60298747 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e44fcdee748190bae6fb76e0cb22f3 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:34 a.m.