Triple
T182457
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cotton |
E3906
|
entity |
| Predicate | isSoft |
P6562
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Cotton, isSoft, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isSoft Context triple: [Cotton, isSoft, true]
-
A.
is
Indicates that two entities are equivalent, share an attribute, or stand in a specified state or relation to each other.
-
B.
isAbout
Indicates that one entity has as its subject, focus, or primary concern the content, topic, or theme represented by another entity.
-
C.
isArtificial
Indicates that an entity is man-made or produced by human design rather than occurring naturally.
-
D.
isSubjectTo
Indicates that one entity is governed, affected, or constrained by the authority, rules, conditions, or influence of another entity.
-
E.
susceptibleTo
Indicates that one entity is vulnerable or likely to be affected, harmed, or influenced by another entity or factor.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2592516748190a85ae58eec191f14 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2566dfc388190988b1b42d5daaafe |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a257e763d081908c54ad57d8d3060d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.