Triple
T18244764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Monga National Park |
E436921
|
entity |
| Predicate | nearestTown |
P350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Braidwood |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Braidwood | Statement: [Monga National Park, nearestTown, Braidwood]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Braidwood Context triple: [Monga National Park, nearestTown, Braidwood]
-
A.
Braidwood
Braidwood is a small village in northeastern Illinois, known historically for coal mining and its proximity to the Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station.
-
B.
Braidwood
chosen
Braidwood is a historic rural town in New South Wales, Australia, known for its well-preserved 19th-century streetscape and heritage architecture.
-
C.
Oreston
Oreston is a suburban district of Plymouth in Devon, England, known for its riverside location and maritime character.
-
D.
Ringwood
Ringwood is a historic market town in Hampshire, England, situated near the New Forest and known for its traditional town centre and riverside setting.
-
E.
Ringwood
Ringwood is a suburb in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, known as a key residential and commercial hub in the city's eastern region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b91104e08190a8241f7d260a5162 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4f7e5d63081908d0e6249578867a1 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:33 a.m.