Triple
T18232853
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Telefutura |
E436587
|
entity |
| Predicate | rebrandingType |
P115220
|
FINISHED |
| Object | network name change |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: network name change | Statement: [Telefutura, rebrandingType, network name change]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rebrandingType Context triple: [Telefutura, rebrandingType, network name change]
-
A.
rebrandingProgram
chosen
Indicates a program or initiative through which an entity changes or updates its brand identity, such as its name, logo, or overall image.
-
B.
announcedRebrandingAs
Indicates that one entity has publicly declared it will change its name, brand, or identity to that of another entity.
-
C.
brandRevival
Indicates the process or action of restoring a declining or dormant brand to renewed strength, relevance, and market presence.
-
D.
brandingNote
Indicates that an entity has an associated note or comment specifically about its branding, such as style, usage, or presentation guidelines.
-
E.
brandingFeature
Indicates that one entity serves as a branding-related characteristic, element, or attribute that helps define or distinguish another entity’s brand identity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9103a8081908bbb0836fef10efd |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4f4b414308190bc7dd8e73c0a362c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4332336cc8190808b9c70c888ba65 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:33 a.m.