Triple
T18229543
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Judith Steinberg Dean |
E436507
|
entity |
| Predicate | spouse |
P13
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Howard Dean |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Howard Dean | Statement: [Judith Steinberg Dean, spouse, Howard Dean]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Howard Dean Context triple: [Judith Steinberg Dean, spouse, Howard Dean]
-
A.
Howard Dean
chosen
Howard Dean is an American physician and politician who served as governor of Vermont and later became a prominent Democratic National Committee chairman and early advocate of internet-based political campaigning.
-
B.
John Edwards
John Edwards is a New Zealand lawyer and privacy expert who serves as the United Kingdom’s Information Commissioner, overseeing data protection and information rights.
-
C.
John Edwards
John Edwards is a musician known for his work as a member of the band The Stooges.
-
D.
John Edwards
John Edwards is an American lawyer and former U.S. senator from North Carolina who was the Democratic vice-presidential nominee in the 2004 election.
-
E.
John Edwards
John Edwards was an American statesman who represented South Carolina in the Continental Congress during the Revolutionary era.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9103a8081908bbb0836fef10efd |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4f4b1b2108190a5585bbfaf2d295b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:28 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:33 a.m.