Triple

T18223305
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Little Pink House: A True Story of Defiance and Courage E436359 entity
Predicate mainSubject P3 FINISHED
Object Kelo v. City of New London — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kelo v. City of New London | Statement: [Little Pink House: A True Story of Defiance and Courage, mainSubject, Kelo v. City of New London]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Kelo v. City of New London
Context triple: [Little Pink House: A True Story of Defiance and Courage, mainSubject, Kelo v. City of New London]
  • A. Kelo v. City of New London chosen
    Kelo v. City of New London is a landmark 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the interpretation of “public use” under the Takings Clause to allow government seizure of private property for economic development projects.
  • B. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • C. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
    Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highway construction through public parks and strengthened judicial review of administrative decisions.
  • D. Keech v Sandford
    Keech v Sandford is an 18th-century English trust law case establishing the strict fiduciary duty of loyalty, holding that trustees cannot personally profit from opportunities arising from their position.
  • E. Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff
    Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly interpreted the Fifth Amendment’s Public Use Clause to allow government use of eminent domain for economic and social policy goals, such as breaking up concentrated land ownership.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b9103a8081908bbb0836fef10efd completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4e47d9b348190897d5a1e70b39ec5 completed April 19, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:32 a.m.