Triple
T1821873
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Working Group on Amendments |
E40555
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfAmendmentsHandled |
P17936
|
FINISHED |
| Object | substantive amendments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: substantive amendments | Statement: [Working Group on Amendments, typeOfAmendmentsHandled, substantive amendments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfAmendmentsHandled Context triple: [Working Group on Amendments, typeOfAmendmentsHandled, substantive amendments]
-
A.
typeOfAmendment
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of amendment that is being applied to something, such as a document, law, or agreement.
-
B.
hasAmendments
Indicates that one entity (such as a document, law, or agreement) includes or is associated with one or more modifications, changes, or additions made after its original creation.
-
C.
legalAmendment
Indicates a formal change or modification made to an existing law, regulation, or legal document.
-
D.
amendmentRequires
Indicates that a particular amendment is necessary or must be applied in relation to another item, document, or condition.
-
E.
partiallyAmendedBy
Indicates that an existing item (such as a document, law, or agreement) has been modified in part, but not completely replaced, by another item.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864526c081908a3a4d74f689e2c5 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aba67721788190951beae25e885457 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61d884548190a19cf3a6b5ae9d48 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:32 p.m.