Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: McGhee v. Sipes | Statement: [Hurd v. Hodge, relatedCase, McGhee v. Sipes]

Target entity: McGhee v. Sipes
Context triple: [Hurd v. Hodge, relatedCase, McGhee v. Sipes]

• A. McGhee v. Sipes chosen
  McGhee v. Sipes is a landmark 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside Shelley v. Kraemer, held that courts could not enforce racially restrictive covenants in property deeds without violating the Equal Protection Clause.
• B. McDonald v. Smith
  McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
• C. Miller v. Johnson
  Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
• D. McDonough v. Smith
  McDonough v. Smith is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified when the statute of limitations begins to run for a fabricated-evidence due process claim under Section 1983, holding that it accrues only once the underlying criminal proceedings have terminated in the defendant’s favor.
• E. Hurd v. Hodge
  Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.