Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Shelley v. Kraemer | Statement: [Hurd v. Hodge, relatedCase, Shelley v. Kraemer]

Target entity: Shelley v. Kraemer
Context triple: [Hurd v. Hodge, relatedCase, Shelley v. Kraemer]

• A. Shelley v. Kraemer chosen
  Shelley v. Kraemer is a landmark 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held courts could not enforce racially restrictive housing covenants, marking a major civil rights victory against residential segregation.
• B. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
  Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may prohibit all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property under 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
• C. Hansberry v. Lee
  Hansberry v. Lee is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case involving racially restrictive housing covenants that helped inspire the themes of Lorraine Hansberry’s play "A Raisin in the Sun."
• D. Regan v. Wald
  Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
• E. Easley v. Cromartie
  Easley v. Cromartie is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld North Carolina’s 12th Congressional District against a racial gerrymandering challenge by finding that political, rather than racial, considerations predominated in its redistricting.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.