Triple
T18207345
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Shankara |
E435940
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | commentator on the Prasthanatrayi |
C39894
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: commentator on the Prasthanatrayi Context triple: [Shankara, instanceOf, commentator on the Prasthanatrayi]
-
A.
commentator on Aristotle
A commentator on Aristotle is a scholar who interprets, explains, and critically engages with Aristotle’s texts to clarify their meaning, context, and philosophical implications for contemporary and historical audiences.
-
B.
commentator on Plato
A commentator on Plato is a scholar or writer who analyzes, interprets, and explains Plato’s dialogues, arguments, and philosophical ideas, often situating them within their historical context and assessing their relevance to later thought.
-
C.
commentator on Ibn Arabi
A commentator on Ibn Arabi is a scholar who studies, interprets, and explains the metaphysical, mystical, and linguistic complexities of Ibn Arabi’s works to make them accessible and coherent within broader intellectual and spiritual traditions.
-
D.
Shaiva scripture commentary
A Shaiva scripture commentary is an interpretive text that explains, analyzes, and contextualizes sacred Shaiva scriptures, clarifying their philosophical, ritual, and devotional meanings for practitioners and scholars.
-
E.
commentator on Roman law
A commentator on Roman law is a legal scholar who analyzes, interprets, and explains the principles, texts, and historical applications of Roman legal systems.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90dba6481908e119eb9aa4ca0cb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:32 a.m.