Triple

T18198873
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ESPaDOnS E435729 entity
Predicate resolvingPower P7238 FINISHED
Object up to about 65,000 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: up to about 65,000 | Statement: [ESPaDOnS, resolvingPower, up to about 65,000]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resolvingPower
Context triple: [ESPaDOnS, resolvingPower, up to about 65,000]
  • A. spectralResolution chosen
    Indicates the fineness with which a system can distinguish or separate different wavelengths or frequencies within a spectrum.
  • B. sensorResolution
    Indicates the level of detail or precision with which a sensor can measure or distinguish changes in the observed quantity or environment.
  • C. resolutionOf
    Indicates that one entity is the formal decision, outcome, or solution produced in response to, or for the purpose of addressing, another entity such as an issue, proposal, or problem.
  • D. typicalMagnification
    Indicates the usual or characteristic degree to which something is enlarged or magnified under normal or standard conditions.
  • E. viewfinderResolution
    Indicates the resolution or level of detail provided by a device’s viewfinder display.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90dba6481908e119eb9aa4ca0cb completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4e0d545f4819090285d1446bd3c27 completed April 19, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4331e92408190ad607ba4956a3897 completed April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:31 a.m.