Triple
T18195389
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Krimml Waterfalls |
E435647
|
entity |
| Predicate | region |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pinzgau |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pinzgau | Statement: [Krimml Waterfalls, region, Pinzgau]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pinzgau Context triple: [Krimml Waterfalls, region, Pinzgau]
-
A.
Pinzgau
chosen
Pinzgau is a mountainous region in the Austrian state of Salzburg, known for its Alpine landscapes, ski resorts, and traditional rural culture.
-
B.
Haslital
Haslital is a valley in the Bernese Oberland region of Switzerland, known for its dramatic alpine landscapes, waterfalls, and access to major mountain passes.
-
C.
Grauspitz
Grauspitz is a prominent alpine peak in the Rätikon range of the Alps, known as the highest mountain in Liechtenstein and shared with Switzerland.
-
D.
Oschwand
Oschwand is a small locality in Switzerland known for its association with the Swiss painter Cuno Amiet, who lived and worked there.
-
E.
Rorschacherberg
Rorschacherberg is a municipality in the canton of St. Gallen in northeastern Switzerland, situated above Lake Constance with views over the lake and surrounding region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b90dba6481908e119eb9aa4ca0cb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4e0d2ad5881909d846f3851ac9ec9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:31 a.m.