Triple

T18190541
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Institutional Securities E435520 entity
Predicate clientFocus P23437 FINISHED
Object institutional clients LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: institutional clients | Statement: [Institutional Securities, clientFocus, institutional clients]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: clientFocus
Context triple: [Institutional Securities, clientFocus, institutional clients]
  • A. importFocus
    Indicates that attention, priority, or emphasis is being brought into or concentrated on a particular entity or aspect.
  • B. customerFocus chosen
    Indicates that one entity prioritizes understanding and meeting the needs, preferences, or satisfaction of another entity (typically a customer or client).
  • C. focusesOn
    Indicates that one entity directs its attention, effort, or primary activity toward another entity or specific subject.
  • D. deviceFocus
    Indicates that attention, control, or primary interaction is directed toward a particular device in a given context.
  • E. canonicalFocus
    Indicates that one entity is the primary or most representative focus or point of attention in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90c7ec081909b4694ccecb449c6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4e0cf0d7c81908ce0386c52ef601d completed April 19, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4331e92408190ad607ba4956a3897 completed April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:31 a.m.